The “Ugly Chinese”
In April, Zenpundit dropped some serious knowledge on this blog regarding Chinese nationalists that you can read here.
I found his comment illuminating for understanding what those in the government and the elite class think.
Yet what do the people think though? And by that, not just in China but around the world?
The thuggish behavior of Chinese bodyguards (ostensibly in response to thuggish behavior by certain protesters) as mentioned in more detail by TDAXP in a variety of posts is one thing, but the pathetic (for lack of a better word to describe the mix of rage, indignity and delusion shown by far too many of them) behavior of some Chinese abroad during the past few weeks is another.
The New York Times relates the story of some vocal Chinese students engaging in misguided propaganda operations on American soil that would be comical if not for the seriousness of certain members of those involved, as well as the developing pattern of academic censorship (trying to force certain subjects off the table of discussion) and even criminal behavior (taking photos and ID’ing of a Chinese student at Duke University who tried to make peace between feuding protesters (amongst other high crimes she committed in the students’ eyes) that has led to her family going in hiding and her fearing for her safety @ Duke).
As an insightful friend with Peruvian immigrant parents who attends grad school at Duke noted, “We love Chinese goods (low prices!) and respect the Chinese people, but we like our political and social system thank you very much, its preferable to what goes on there much as that may be hard to appreciate sometimes and certainly do not like to be told by the largely elite children of a dictatorship how to conduct it.”
He and others report the tactics of these Chinese students has backfired even in liberal PC land (aka Duke). More students than ever before are expressing interest in what are conceived by these Chinese students as “China-bashing”; supporting peace in Dar Fur, protesting the marginalization of the Tibetans to Chinese immigrants and power in Tibet, freedom in Zimbabwe & Burma. Attitudes are hardening and China’s image is suffering greatly more from the actions of students defending it than actual Chinese policies at this point. Even more, not just at Duke but elsewhere where these types of shenanigans are ongoing, there is a growing resentment among American students toward these rude guests.
Around the world, John Pomfret theorizes that Chinese soft power is ebbing, perhaps even collapsing of its own contradictions and excesses, a questionable but nevertheless fascinating possibility in the wake of other such behaviors by Chinese citizens and of course the Chinese government. He elaborates:
Move over ugly American, make room for the ugly Chinese.
“In Seoul on Sunday, groups of Chinese students accosted protesters demonstrating against China’s treatment of North Korean refugees and Beijing’s policies in Tibet. The attacks by the Chinese occurred as the Olympic torch wended its way on its seemingly never-ending journey around the world. The South Korean government was justifiably angry. China, after initially denying the events occurred, has now taken steps to still the waters. But the damage has been done. China’s angry youth - called “fen qing” in Chinese - are ruining their country’s reputation around the world and spelling the end of a decade-long honeymoon that the world has had with China.
The flare-up was the latest deeply troubling and profoundly weird event to mar the globe-trotting journey of the torch, which the Beijing government has dubbed “the sacred flame.” (Remember, these dudes are officially atheists.) Before Seoul, we had Chinese cops in blue and white tracksuits manhandling demonstrators in Paris and London; we had a Chinese woman in the United States who participated in a pro-Tibet protest being identified on a listserv run by Chinese students; now her parents are on the run in China and her high school in Qingdao has revoked her diploma; and we’ve witnessed the incessant hounding of Tibetan and other speakers on US campuses by Chinese students. In cities around the world, the Chinese embassy has fanned the passions of the “angry youth” by encouraging them to demonstrate, handing out T-shirts and flags.
While I have no problem with displays of patriotic feeling, the only thing these “angry youth” are accomplishing is turning the world away from China. And they are not alone in this ill-fated effort to get China’s point across. China’s propaganda machine is also seriously in need of repairs.”
I called this “ruthless incompetence” and I’ll repeat that description again. However profitable the Chinese patronage system may have become in the past few years (gathering needed resources from Burma, Zimbabwe, Sudan, etc.), it is backfiring and likely to further worsen for China (as one can only imagine the attitude of the Chinese government and tens of millions of Chinese towards the rest of the world’s opinion once the Olympics have finished).
The Chinese gov’t likes to say “its all business” but they are wrecking much of their vaunted product line; from faith in effective Chinese global leadership to the image presented by China’s public diplomats (not to mention literal Chinese designed and/or manufactured products themselves!).
These are certainly growing pains as described by Dan @ TDAXP and Thomas PM Barnett on numerous occasions. Yet what if they’re something more? What if the Chinese can’t figure this out on their own any time soon and only make things worse for themselves? What if they miss their chance to grab the mantle (or at least part of it) of global leadership for the next 5-7 years or even longer? What if rather than recalibrating their “soft power” at a time when its failing they instead hunker down?
(One could only imagine the possibilities if America actually had effective leadership instead of people talking about obliterating Iran and alienating Russia, China and other non-democracies.
*A final note, I find it amusing almost that the students also epitomize the angst of a rising superpower who does not yet understand what its like to be at or near the apex of global power (i.e. respect and appreciation is nil from others).
No matter what China does, these students say, it cannot win in the arena of world opinion. “When we have a billion people, you said we were destroying the planet./ When we tried limiting our numbers, you said it is human rights abuse,” reads a poem posted on the Internet by “a silent, silent Chinese” and cited by some students as an accurate expression of their feelings. “When we were poor, you thought we were dogs./ When we loan you cash, you blame us for your debts./ When we build our industries, you called us polluters./ When we sell you goods, you blame us for global warming.”
Rather than blend in to the prevailing campus ethos of free debate, the more strident Chinese students seem to replicate the authoritarian framework of their homeland, photographing demonstration participants and sometimes drowning out dissent.
Would they like wine with that cheese? Welcome to the lonely world of a modern superpower.

Good post.
The “charm offensive” line never made a great deal of sense. It was based on one aspect of China’s foreign direct investment strategy:
“We do not care about you or your people.”
This is a function of China being one of the most materialistic states in history.
To regimes are shuned precisely because the West does care, this was great. Sudan, Zimbabwe, Burma, and others experience large-scale cash infusions, in exchange for raw materials, and even got some infrastructure development in the bargain.
The tails side of this benign neglect, which is of course just the heads again — “We do not care about you or your people” — is now being felt. When it comes to Darfur, Zimbabwe, and other states, China isn’t incompetent: it’s just serenely unconcerned.
This is combined with China suddenly being criticized from all sides for all actions. This is what big, important countries face regularly.
“No matter what China does, these students say, it cannot win in the arena of world opinion. ”
That’s probably true. Same is true for America. Same was true for Britain back in the day.
China needs the institutional knowledge for riding out these big-country problems, including avoiding stupid escalations. China’s in a good position to learn these lessons now.
And of course, it’s a really good thing if the CSCA (Chinse Students & Scholas Association)-sponsored counter-protests at American universities backfire. It’s very important the Party get the message that it is failing.
Because with failing comes learning.
Dan,
Thank you!
Agreed that China exhibits a degree of serene unconcern with internal matters and developments in these countries. Given the possibility of widespread war in the Sudan and domestic turmoil in Zimbabwe and Burma, this lack of concern may yet to come back and haunt the Chinese by disrupting their resource extractions.
Granted, this will likely lead to some degree of China “shrinking the Gap” via a mix of Sys Admin & even Levithian-esque methods, but at what cost and will these work?
I remain convinced almost that China & the US will be on different sides in the coming Sudanese civil war and I am most interested in how far China and the US will go to defend their interests there.
Your analysis of China needing to fail to learn is spot-on, I just hope they learn the right lessons as well as in good time.
The book written last year about China’s soft power was strongest when examining China’s efforts in SE Asia, where I think it was more than just 1 aspect of its FDI strategy and went to the heart of learning mistakes from the mid-90’s when they were literally scaring their neighbors into America’s arms because of their hostile and overt actions regarding offshore resources, the safety of Chinese diasporas and respect for China’s role in the region.
Until this year, it all was quite sophisticated and quite effective in isolating foreign rivals like the US & EU out of Central Asia, SE Asia, etc.
[...] Move over ugly American, make room for the ugly Chinese [...]
[...] Move over ugly American, make room for the ugly Chinese [...]