Crony capitalism receives more prominent attention via the Atlantic’s October issue. Gregg Easterbrook takes aim at one of the grandest corporate thieves, the tax-free NFL and its legions of public welfare needy owners.
Considering the public fiascoes in Miami over the Marlins stadium, Minnesota’s nearly half a billion dollar gift to the Vikings and other continued flagrant violations of public interest, I will not hold my breath for any actual progress.
I do love this proposal though:
The NFL’s nonprofit status should be revoked. And lawmakers—ideally in Congress, to level the national playing field, as it were—should require that television images created in publicly funded sports facilities cannot be privatized. The devil would be in the details of any such action. But Congress regulates health care, airspace, and other far-more-complex aspects of contemporary life; it can crack the whip on the NFL.
If football images created in places funded by taxpayers became public domain, the league would respond by paying the true cost of future stadiums—while negotiating to repay construction subsidies already received. To do otherwise would mean the loss of billions in television-rights fees. Pro football would remain just as exciting and popular, but would no longer take advantage of average people.
The ‘next big thing’ obsession of municipalities and regions is often central to these public treasury abuses, as they seek the next big thing that can restore, revamp or just further entrench their status among counterparts in America and the world. Nor rarely can the ‘white elephant’ complex be far behind as governments chase the highly improbable.
Not for the last time, may I add that civic spirit does not exist in modern America?
Meanwhile in my new home of Raleigh, we have a classic one-sided “woe be the inner urban poor” story.
So it’s clear to Johnson and her neighbors that someone wants them out – their apartments knocked down and replaced by something more profitable.
The potential sale of 245 apartments for lower-income people has reignited long-simmering fears that downtown Raleigh’s rebirth will crowd out poorer neighbors to the south and east, swallowing up blocks suddenly turned valuable.
For most communities, the obsession by some on the Left for housing equality access taking precedence over infill development is terribly misplaced.
Raleigh’s struggles to overcome its own underutilized urban core are only intensified by these theatrics which accomplish little and undermine much.
Maximizing the productivity of core areas with excellent development potential is an act of social justice in itself, improving countless vital metrics across the board from tax revenues to public service provisions (transit, policing, schools). Concerns that people will be pushed out are valid but ultimately far less consequential than the benefits that accrue from that process.
The brutal truth is that we are in a time where the government (federal, state or local) does not have the means nor the will to subsidize people to live in prime urban real estate at a great discount and at the expense of long-term societal improvement via revitalizing downtown cores in suburbs, cities and towns.
The valid concerns about this process can be addressed by (not a conclusive list):
- improving transit service (including adding more flexibility into the system) in suburban areas,
- reforming discriminatory zoning codes in suburban areas that tilt multi-family development away from broad appeal and greater income accessibility,
- revitalizing and in some cases creating new foundations of non-profit support of the working poor and the fixed-income elderly
Certainly, I have much more to say about this, especially regarding that above list. That is for another time…